Sponsored Links - Login to hide this ad! |
|
![]() |
#18 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 406
![]() |
![]() Can you make it so that it doesn't requires your Unit Indexing Utilties as I uses PUI and do not need that stuff or just make it a standalone system, even better.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
default string
|
![]() You mean like the "No Storage" version in the first post?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Rehabbing
|
![]() personal preference or some other sinister reason?
__________________ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Full Metal Mapping!
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 270
![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
meh, there still exist idiot like me who use UserData directly in their systems, and thus would create a conflict with attach systems that use it too.... funnily, i wanted to request just the same thing: making a private GetUnitId() function will allow users who already use other indexing systems to use your system(which is really useful, btw ~) to implement this. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 185
![]() |
![]() Because it would save a lot of time recreating this thing on your own. It is far more easier to just replace the requirement of this library and edit the functions that return the unit's ID... I agree on the part that this needs some wrappers for different unit indexing systems.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 | |
Obscurity, the Art
|
![]() Quote:
Furthermore, AutoIndex uses the exact same function names as UIU, so replacing it is trivial. We are trying to standardize the syntax of GetUnitId(MyUnit), so this will work with whatever indexing system you happen to use. Just change the requirement at the top of the LastOrder library. Last edited by Rising_Dusk : 06-21-2009 at 10:00 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 185
![]() |
![]() I was using PUI, that's why I mentioned that.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|