Originally Posted by Anitarf
Don't approve the resource, then, since once it's approved I need to maintain backwards compatibility and there's no way I can ever change that, and I'm perfectly willing to do that if enough people think that makes for a better user interface, after all it would be a pretty lame public resource if people didn't use it because they didn't like the API. So, I'm moving this back to submissions to get more opinions.
You wouldn't lose backwards compatibility by adding
a function call with different parameters, though. There'd be nothing to remove. I guess if you removed the public prefix for those functions, then it might be different.
You also still haven't fixed the spelling of library in the beginning of the script.