Thread: PruneGroup
View Single Post
Old 06-29-2009, 12:23 AM   #9
Anitarf
Procrastination Incarnate


Development Director
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 8,190

Submissions (19)

Anitarf has a brilliant future (903)Anitarf has a brilliant future (903)Anitarf has a brilliant future (903)Anitarf has a brilliant future (903)Anitarf has a brilliant future (903)Anitarf has a brilliant future (903)Anitarf has a brilliant future (903)Anitarf has a brilliant future (903)

2008 Spell olympics - Fire - SilverApproved Map: Old School Alliance TacticsHero Contest #2 - 3rd PlaceSpell making session 2 winner

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rising_Dusk
I like this a lot more than your old approach. I've looked over it and don't see any glaring problems, so I think I will approve this and graveyard the old one. Is that okay?
Sure, if you didn't I was going to graveyard GroupGet myself.
I just did a minor update to the first post, I removed the NO_UNIT_LIMIT constant since if you don't have a unit limit then you needn't use PruneGroup in the first place, you can just do a simple ForGroup. Other than that, the code remains the same.
__________________
Anitarf is offline   Reply With Quote