Thread: PUI 6.0
View Single Post
Old 12-06-2011, 08:51 PM   #7
cohadar
master of fugue
 
cohadar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,453

Submissions (5)

cohadar is just really nice (250)cohadar is just really nice (250)cohadar is just really nice (250)cohadar is just really nice (250)cohadar is just really nice (250)

Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBQ
there is no "space" for different indexers in a single community -- and I can't help but agree with him.

Oh I knew chances of approval were in low percents when I posted this.
It is just a matter of principle for me to try.

I have long ago realized that all systems I make are always better than alternatives.
This has something to do with objective nature of human beings,
but still I would feel bad if I did not try to share my code with other people and assure them in the error of their ways.

EDIT:
I was reading this:
http://www.wc3c.net/vexorian/jasshel...html#arrstruct

and realized that not only that unit indexing does not need support for structs (those idiotic module stuff), it also does not need any textmacros (like PUI_PROPERTY)

In the end, the only thing you need is an integer and a struct that extends array.
You don't need any events for this at all.
__________________
Omg database crash deleted my signature, as a side effect this immensely improved wc3c.
cohadar is offline   Reply With Quote