Originally Posted by Rising_Dusk
I like this a lot more than your old approach. I've looked over it and don't see any glaring problems, so I think I will approve this and graveyard the old one. Is that okay?
Sure, if you didn't I was going to graveyard GroupGet myself.
I just did a minor update to the first post, I removed the NO_UNIT_LIMIT constant since if you don't have a unit limit then you needn't use PruneGroup in the first place, you can just do a simple ForGroup. Other than that, the code remains the same.